BUYO vs VFMF
KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF vs Vanguard US Multifactor ETF
Which is better, BUYO or VFMF?
VFMF has been ahead.
VFMF has a lower expense ratio. VFMF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VFMF is less concentrated, with 9.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 11.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUYO | VFMF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.44% |
| Holdings | 328 | 655 |
| YTD Return | +14.76% | +20.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.72% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -20.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,798 | $14,283Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.2% | 9.2%Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 8, 2024 | Feb 13, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 8, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BUYO vs VFMF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
BUYO vs VFMF Performance
KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF (BUYO) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard US Multifactor ETF (VFMF) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUYO returned +21.72% while VFMF returned +27.58%. Year to date, BUYO is up 14.76% versus a gain of 20.44% for VFMF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUYO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.0% for VFMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for BUYO and -20.6% for VFMF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUYO charges 0.89% per year while VFMF charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $18 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUYO currently yields 0.01% against 1.44% for VFMF.
Holdings Overlap
30.6% of BUYO's money is in holdings VFMF also owns. 12.3% of VFMF's money is in holdings BUYO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
104 positions in common, counted across the 322 positions we hold weights for in BUYO and 654 in VFMF, against full books of 328 and 655.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 525 positions for VFMF that do not appear in our book for BUYO (84.9% of the fund), and 212 for BUYO that do not appear in VFMF (67.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUYO | Weight in VFMF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGAffiliated Managers Group Inc. | 1.13% | 0.22% | 0.91% |
| AXSAxis Capital Holdings Ltd. | 0.85% | 0.24% | 0.61% |
| MTCHMatch Group Inc | 0.88% | 0.20% | 0.68% |
| AMRXAmneal Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 0.90% | 0.14% | 0.76% |
| TIGO:LUMillicom International Cellular Sa Common Stock | 0.82% | 0.21% | 0.61% |
| FTDRFrontdoor Inc | 0.91% | 0.08% | 0.83% |
| TDOCTeladoc Inc | 0.90% | 0.03% | 0.87% |
| GNRCGenerac Holdings, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.05% | 0.83% |
| ENSEnersys | 0.69% | 0.23% | 0.46% |
| RLRalph Lauren Corp. Class A | 0.80% | 0.06% | 0.74% |
30.6% of BUYO is already inside VFMF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUYO or VFMF?
BUYO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VFMF charges 0.18%. VFMF is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUYO or VFMF?
Over the past year BUYO returned +21.72% vs +27.58% for VFMF, so VFMF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUYO annualized +13.13% vs +19.51% for VFMF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUYO or VFMF?
BUYO has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.0% for VFMF. Worst drawdown: BUYO -28.0% vs VFMF -20.6%.
Should I hold both BUYO and VFMF?
BUYO and VFMF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUYO and VFMF?
30.6% of BUYO's money is in holdings VFMF also owns. 12.3% of VFMF's is in holdings BUYO also owns. They hold 104 positions in common, counted across the 322 positions we hold weights for in BUYO and 654 in VFMF.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUYO or VFMF?
BUYO yields 0.01% while VFMF yields 1.44%, so VFMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VFMF better than BUYO?
VFMF has a lower expense ratio. VFMF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VFMF is less concentrated, with 9.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 11.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.