BUYO vs VFMV
KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF vs Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF
Which is better, BUYO or VFMV?
BUYO has been ahead.
VFMV has a lower expense ratio. BUYO led over 1Y and the full window. BUYO is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 15.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUYO | VFMV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.13%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $460M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.63% |
| Holdings | 328 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +14.76%Best | +11.27% |
| 1Y Return | +21.72%Best | +11.99% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -10.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,798Best | $12,208 |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.2%Best | 15.7% |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 8, 2024 | Feb 13, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 8, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BUYO vs VFMV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
BUYO vs VFMV Performance
KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF (BUYO) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUYO returned +21.72% while VFMV returned +11.99%. Year to date, BUYO is up 14.76% versus a gain of 11.27% for VFMV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUYO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 10.4% for VFMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for BUYO and -10.3% for VFMV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUYO charges 0.89% per year while VFMV charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $13 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUYO currently yields 0.01% against 1.63% for VFMV.
Holdings Overlap
6.9% of BUYO's money is in holdings VFMV also owns. 5.6% of VFMV's money is in holdings BUYO also owns.
BUYO and VFMV share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 322 positions we hold weights for in BUYO and 218 in VFMV, against full books of 328 and 204.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 200 positions for VFMV that do not appear in our book for BUYO (93.0% of the fund), and 299 for BUYO that do not appear in VFMV (89.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUYO | Weight in VFMV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NWSANews Corp A | 1.61% | 0.65% | 0.96% |
| EHCEmcompass Health Corporation | 1.36% | 0.48% | 0.88% |
| MTCHMatch Group Inc | 0.88% | 0.32% | 0.56% |
| WKWorkiva Inc | 0.67% | 0.39% | 0.28% |
| ACIWAci Worldwide Inc | 0.56% | 0.44% | 0.12% |
| GRNDGrindr Inc | 0.58% | 0.35% | 0.23% |
| CARGCargurus Inc . | 0.35% | 0.48% | 0.13% |
| NVECNve Corp | 0.07% | 0.62% | 0.55% |
| BOXBox Inc - Class A | 0.06% | 0.62% | 0.56% |
| INGRIngredion Inc | 0.16% | 0.49% | 0.33% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUYO and VFMV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUYO or VFMV?
BUYO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VFMV charges 0.13%. VFMV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUYO or VFMV?
Over the past year BUYO returned +21.72% vs +11.99% for VFMV, so BUYO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUYO annualized +13.13% vs +10.49% for VFMV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUYO or VFMV?
BUYO has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 10.4% for VFMV. Worst drawdown: BUYO -28.0% vs VFMV -10.3%.
Should I hold both BUYO and VFMV?
BUYO and VFMV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUYO and VFMV?
6.9% of BUYO's money is in holdings VFMV also owns. 5.6% of VFMV's is in holdings BUYO also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 322 positions we hold weights for in BUYO and 218 in VFMV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUYO or VFMV?
BUYO yields 0.01% while VFMV yields 1.63%, so VFMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VFMV better than BUYO?
VFMV has a lower expense ratio. BUYO led over 1Y and the full window. BUYO is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 15.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.