BUYZ vs VFMO
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF vs Vanguard US Momentum Factor ETF
Which is better, BUYZ or VFMO?
VFMO has been ahead.
VFMO has a lower expense ratio. VFMO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VFMO is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUYZ | VFMO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.13%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $1.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.60% |
| Holdings | 60 | 673 |
| YTD Return | -9.04% | +14.16%Best |
| 1Y Return | -15.57% | +12.71%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.54% | +11.87%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.4% | 20.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -68.0% | -31.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $7,131 | $17,521Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.3% | 9.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 25, 2020 | Feb 13, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 27, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.6 years).
BUYZ vs VFMO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.6 years both funds cover.
BUYZ vs VFMO Performance
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard US Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUYZ returned -15.57% while VFMO returned +12.71%. Year to date, BUYZ is down 9.04% versus a gain of 14.16% for VFMO.
Over three years, BUYZ compounded at +13.40% per year against +26.18% for VFMO; over five years the annualized figures are -6.54% and +11.87% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VFMO has the edge at +17.34% annualized vs +6.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUYZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.4% compared with 20.9% for VFMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.0% for BUYZ and -31.7% for VFMO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUYZ charges 0.50% per year while VFMO charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $13 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUYZ currently yields 0.00% against 0.60% for VFMO.
Holdings Overlap
18.0% of BUYZ's money is in holdings VFMO also owns. 1.7% of VFMO's money is in holdings BUYZ also owns.
BUYZ and VFMO share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in BUYZ and 695 in VFMO, against full books of 60 and 673.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 631 positions for VFMO that do not appear in our book for BUYZ (93.0% of the fund), and 33 for BUYZ that do not appear in VFMO (64.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUYZ | Weight in VFMO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBAYEbay Inc. | 3.06% | 0.17% | 2.89% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.76% | 0.43% | 2.33% |
| EXPEExpedia Inc | 2.60% | 0.12% | 2.48% |
| GCT:HKGigacloud Technology Inc Class A Ordinary Share | 2.32% | 0.07% | 2.25% |
| LQDTLiquidites (USD) | 2.11% | 0.06% | 2.05% |
| XPOXpo Logistics Inc. | 1.48% | 0.21% | 1.27% |
| CARTMaplebear Inc | 0.95% | 0.07% | 0.88% |
| FIGSFigs Inc Pp | 0.86% | 0.07% | 0.79% |
| ETSYEtsy Inc | 0.70% | 0.08% | 0.62% |
| CPAYCorpay Inc | 0.34% | 0.10% | 0.24% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUYZ and VFMO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUYZ or VFMO?
BUYZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VFMO charges 0.13%. VFMO is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUYZ or VFMO?
Over the past year BUYZ returned -15.57% vs +12.71% for VFMO, so VFMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BUYZ annualized +6.09% vs +17.34% for VFMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUYZ or VFMO?
BUYZ has been the more volatile fund at 28.4% annualized versus 20.9% for VFMO. Worst drawdown: BUYZ -68.0% vs VFMO -31.7%.
Should I hold both BUYZ and VFMO?
BUYZ and VFMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUYZ and VFMO?
18.0% of BUYZ's money is in holdings VFMO also owns. 1.7% of VFMO's is in holdings BUYZ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in BUYZ and 695 in VFMO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUYZ or VFMO?
BUYZ yields 0.00% while VFMO yields 0.60%, so VFMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VFMO better than BUYZ?
VFMO has a lower expense ratio. VFMO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VFMO is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.