CATH vs SCHD
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, CATH or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. CATH led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. CATH is less concentrated, with 40.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CATH | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $111.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.76% | 3.24% |
| Holdings | 890 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +12.09% | +25.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.80% | +31.80%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24%Best | +17.07% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.69%Best | +9.69% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,381Best | $15,879 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.7%Best | 41.6% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2016 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 19, 2016 to Oct 15, 2026 (10.5 years).
CATH vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.5 years both funds cover.
CATH vs SCHD Performance
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CATH returned +14.80% while SCHD returned +31.80%. Year to date, CATH is up 12.09% versus a gain of 25.99% for SCHD.
Over three years, CATH compounded at +21.24% per year against +17.07% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +11.69% and +9.69% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CATH has the edge at +13.73% annualized vs +11.30%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CATH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.1% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for CATH and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CATH charges 0.29% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $6 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CATH currently yields 0.76% against 3.24% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
6.6% of CATH's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 70.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings CATH also owns.
Most of SCHD is already inside CATH. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
38 positions in common, counted across the 443 positions we hold weights for in CATH and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 890 and 206.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 59 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for CATH (29.6% of the fund), and 402 for CATH that do not appear in SCHD (93.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CATH | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.43% | 4.89% | 4.46% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.31% | 4.61% | 4.30% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.02% | 3.86% | 2.84% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.71% | 4.16% | 3.45% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.62% | 4.14% | 3.52% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.43% | 3.77% | 3.34% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.29% | 3.88% | 3.59% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.36% | 3.80% | 3.44% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.23% | 3.91% | 3.68% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 0.19% | 3.13% | 2.94% |
70.2% of SCHD is already inside CATH.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CATH or SCHD?
CATH has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CATH or SCHD?
Over the past year CATH returned +14.80% vs +31.80% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CATH annualized +13.73% vs +11.30% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CATH or SCHD?
CATH has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.1% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: CATH -34.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CATH and SCHD?
CATH and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CATH and SCHD?
70.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings CATH also owns. 70.2% of SCHD's is in holdings CATH also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 443 positions we hold weights for in CATH and 98 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, CATH or SCHD?
CATH yields 0.76% while SCHD yields 3.24%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than CATH?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. CATH led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. CATH is less concentrated, with 40.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.