CGCV vs FDAT
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs Tactical Advantage ETF
Which is better, CGCV or FDAT?
CGCV has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | FDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 1.16% |
| AUM | $2.1B | $36M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 5.94% |
| Holdings | 146 | 9 |
| YTD Return | +8.70%Best | +2.79% |
| 1Y Return | +11.37%Best | +2.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9% | 7.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -8.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $13,706Best | $11,729 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0% | - |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Tactical Advantage |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Apr 11, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
CGCV vs FDAT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
CGCV vs FDAT Performance
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is an ETF from Tactical Advantage. Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% while FDAT returned +2.00%. Year to date, CGCV is up 8.70% versus a gain of 2.79% for FDAT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.9% compared with 7.6% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -8.2% for FDAT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while FDAT charges 1.16%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $116 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 5.94% for FDAT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 73 holdings in CGCV and 8 in FDAT, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 8 in FDAT, against full books of 146 and 9.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for FDAT that do not appear in our book for CGCV (100.0% of the fund), and 69 for CGCV that do not appear in FDAT (94.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGCV and FDAT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or FDAT?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while FDAT charges 1.16%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGCV or FDAT?
Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% vs +2.00% for FDAT, so CGCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGCV annualized +14.69% vs +7.18% for FDAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGCV or FDAT?
CGCV has been the more volatile fund at 9.9% annualized versus 7.6% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs FDAT -8.2%.
Should I hold both CGCV and FDAT?
CGCV and FDAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or FDAT?
CGCV yields 1.59% while FDAT yields 5.94%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDAT better than CGCV?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.