CGCV vs FGSI
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
Which is better, CGCV or FGSI?
CGCV has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. FGSI is less concentrated, with 24.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | FGSI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $2.1B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 8.42% |
| Holdings | 146 | 104 |
| YTD Return | +9.26%Best | +8.87% |
| 1Y Return | +11.65%Best | +5.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 8.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -7.9%Best | -8.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,895Best | $11,279 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0% | 24.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Jun 25, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026 (1.3 years).
CGCV vs FGSI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
CGCV vs FGSI Performance
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year CGCV returned +11.65% while FGSI returned +5.98%. Year to date, CGCV is up 9.26% versus a gain of 8.87% for FGSI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.3% compared with 8.8% for FGSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.9% for CGCV and -8.6% for FGSI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while FGSI charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $85 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 8.42% for FGSI.
Holdings Overlap
23.3% of CGCV's money is in holdings FGSI also owns. 22.7% of FGSI's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.
CGCV and FGSI share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 50 in FGSI, against full books of 146 and 104.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 39 positions for FGSI that do not appear in our book for CGCV (76.7% of the fund), and 58 for CGCV that do not appear in FGSI (71.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGCV | Weight in FGSI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.20% | 2.57% | 3.63% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.04% | 1.87% | 2.17% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.72% | 2.22% | 0.50% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.00% | 1.91% | 1.09% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.16% | 2.25% | 0.09% |
| GLWCorning Inc. | 1.29% | 2.07% | 0.78% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.99% | 2.25% | 1.26% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.88% | 1.98% | 1.10% |
| CBChubb Ltd Common Stock Usd 24.15 | 0.87% | 1.84% | 0.97% |
| BKRBaker Hughes A Ge Company | 0.56% | 1.96% | 1.40% |
23.3% of CGCV is already inside FGSI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or FGSI?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while FGSI charges 0.85%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGCV or FGSI?
Over the past year CGCV returned +11.65% vs +5.98% for FGSI, so CGCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGCV annualized +14.28% vs +9.70% for FGSI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGCV or FGSI?
CGCV has been the more volatile fund at 9.3% annualized versus 8.8% for FGSI. Worst drawdown: CGCV -7.9% vs FGSI -8.6%.
Should I hold both CGCV and FGSI?
CGCV and FGSI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and FGSI?
23.3% of CGCV's money is in holdings FGSI also owns. 22.7% of FGSI's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 50 in FGSI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or FGSI?
CGCV yields 1.59% while FGSI yields 8.42%, so FGSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FGSI better than CGCV?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. FGSI is less concentrated, with 24.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.