CGCV vs INFO
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, CGCV or INFO?
INFO has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. INFO led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | INFO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $2.1B | $956M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 0.31% |
| Holdings | 146 | 270 |
| YTD Return | +8.70% | +15.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.37% | +19.78%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1%Best | -19.6% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,466 | $14,109Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0%Best | 42.4% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Oct 8, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
CGCV vs INFO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
CGCV vs INFO Performance
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF (INFO) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% while INFO returned +19.78%. Year to date, CGCV is up 8.70% versus a gain of 15.29% for INFO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
INFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 10.2% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -19.6% for INFO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while INFO charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $35 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 0.31% for INFO.
Holdings Overlap
56.8% of CGCV's money is in holdings INFO also owns. 49.7% of INFO's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 151 in INFO, against full books of 146 and 270.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 107 positions for INFO that do not appear in our book for CGCV (50.0% of the fund), and 37 for CGCV that do not appear in INFO (37.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGCV | Weight in INFO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.20% | 5.94% | 0.26% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.16% | 9.16% | 7.00% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.07% | 7.87% | 4.80% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.91% | 5.83% | 3.92% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.04% | 2.00% | 2.04% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.72% | 2.66% | 0.06% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.00% | 1.80% | 1.20% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.41% | 1.22% | 2.19% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.66% | 1.35% | 1.31% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.00% | 0.18% | 2.82% |
56.8% of CGCV is already inside INFO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or INFO?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while INFO charges 0.35%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGCV or INFO?
Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% vs +19.78% for INFO, so INFO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGCV annualized +11.65% vs +18.78% for INFO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGCV or INFO?
INFO has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 10.2% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs INFO -19.6%.
Should I hold both CGCV and INFO?
CGCV and INFO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and INFO?
56.8% of CGCV's money is in holdings INFO also owns. 49.7% of INFO's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 151 in INFO.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or INFO?
CGCV yields 1.59% while INFO yields 0.31%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is INFO better than CGCV?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. INFO led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.