CGCV vs JLCO

CGCV vs JLCO

Which is better, CGCV or JLCO?

CGCV costs less.

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%.

Lower Fees: CGCVLess Concentrated: CGCV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGCVJLCO
Expense Ratio0.33%Best0.39%
AUM$2.1B$11M
Dividend Yield1.59%0.00%
Holdings146108
YTD Return+8.70%Best+2.73%
1Y Return+11.37%-
Top 10 Weight33.0%Best47.1%
Fund FamilyCapital Group (US)John Hancock Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 25, 2024Jul 14, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CGCV vs JLCO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare CGCV against instead:CGCV vs SPYCGCV vs QQQCGCV vs VOOCGCV vs VTIJLCO against:JLCO vs VXUS

CGCV vs JLCO Performance

Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF (JLCO) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Year to date, CGCV is up 8.70% versus a gain of 2.73% for JLCO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CGCV charges 0.33% per year while JLCO charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $39 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 0.00% for JLCO.

Holdings Overlap

CGCV already in JLCO23.7%
JLCO already in CGCV35.7%

23.7% of CGCV's money is in holdings JLCO also owns. 35.7% of JLCO's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 55 in JLCO, against full books of 146 and 108.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 38 positions for JLCO that do not appear in our book for CGCV (57.5% of the fund), and 59 for CGCV that do not appear in JLCO (71.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CGCVWeight in JLCODifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.20%7.94%1.74%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.91%6.84%4.93%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.04%4.47%0.43%
NVDANvidia Corp2.16%5.22%3.06%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.40%4.05%1.65%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.00%2.62%0.38%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares1.51%1.67%0.16%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.45%0.94%0.51%
COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.010.52%1.32%0.80%
MSMorgan Stanley0.55%0.66%0.11%

35.7% of JLCO is already inside CGCV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CGCVJLCO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CGCV or JLCO?

CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while JLCO charges 0.39%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and JLCO?

35.7% of JLCO's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 35.7% of JLCO's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 55 in JLCO.

Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or JLCO?

CGCV yields 1.59% while JLCO yields 0.00%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JLCO better than CGCV?

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.