CGCV vs JUDO

CGCV vs JUDO

Which is better, CGCV or JUDO?

CGCV costs less.

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.7%.

Lower Fees: CGCVLess Concentrated: CGCV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGCVJUDO
Expense Ratio0.33%Best0.55%
AUM$2.1B$8M
Dividend Yield1.59%2.87%
Holdings146128
YTD Return+9.26%+13.22%Best
1Y Return+11.65%-
Top 10 Weight33.0%Best41.7%
Fund FamilyCapital Group (US)Janus Henderson Investors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 25, 2024Mar 24, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CGCV vs JUDO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare CGCV against instead:CGCV vs SPYCGCV vs QQQCGCV vs VOOCGCV vs VTIJUDO against:JUDO vs VXUS

CGCV vs JUDO Performance

Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Janus Henderson US Equity Enhanced Income ETF (JUDO) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Year to date, CGCV is up 9.26% versus a gain of 13.22% for JUDO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CGCV charges 0.33% per year while JUDO charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $55 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 2.87% for JUDO.

Holdings Overlap

CGCV already in JUDO54.7%
JUDO already in CGCV54.4%

54.7% of CGCV's money is in holdings JUDO also owns. 54.4% of JUDO's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

31 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 70 in JUDO, against full books of 146 and 128.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 39 positions for JUDO that do not appear in our book for CGCV (45.6% of the fund), and 38 for CGCV that do not appear in JUDO (40.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CGCVWeight in JUDODifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.20%6.86%0.66%
NVDANvidia Corp2.16%8.20%6.04%
AAPLApple, Inc3.07%4.70%1.63%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.04%3.13%0.91%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.00%2.06%0.94%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.3.41%1.37%2.04%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.40%2.28%0.12%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares3.00%1.22%1.78%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.66%1.34%1.32%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.72%0.95%1.77%

54.7% of CGCV is already inside JUDO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CGCVJUDO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CGCV or JUDO?

CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while JUDO charges 0.55%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and JUDO?

54.7% of CGCV's money is in holdings JUDO also owns. 54.4% of JUDO's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 70 in JUDO.

Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or JUDO?

CGCV yields 1.59% while JUDO yields 2.87%, so JUDO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JUDO better than CGCV?

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.