CGCV vs NANC
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF
Which is better, CGCV or NANC?
NANC has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | NANC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.72% |
| AUM | $2.1B | $298M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | 146 | 181 |
| YTD Return | +8.70% | +13.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.37% | +15.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1%Best | -20.9% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $13,706 | $14,253Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0%Best | 47.5% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Subversive Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Feb 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
CGCV vs NANC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
CGCV vs NANC Performance
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (NANC) is an ETF from Subversive Capital. Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% while NANC returned +15.98%. Year to date, CGCV is up 8.70% versus a gain of 13.64% for NANC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -20.9% for NANC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while NANC charges 0.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $72 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 0.18% for NANC.
Holdings Overlap
54.2% of CGCV's money is in holdings NANC also owns. 41.6% of NANC's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 89 in NANC, against full books of 146 and 181.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 61 positions for NANC that do not appear in our book for CGCV (58.1% of the fund), and 43 for CGCV that do not appear in NANC (42.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGCV | Weight in NANC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.20% | 6.66% | 0.46% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.16% | 8.78% | 6.62% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.07% | 4.41% | 1.34% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.41% | 2.94% | 0.47% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.45% | 4.52% | 3.07% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.00% | 2.45% | 0.55% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.72% | 2.37% | 0.35% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.04% | 1.00% | 3.04% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.00% | 0.39% | 2.61% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.66% | 0.29% | 2.37% |
54.2% of CGCV is already inside NANC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or NANC?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while NANC charges 0.72%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGCV or NANC?
Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% vs +15.98% for NANC, so NANC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGCV annualized +14.69% vs +16.66% for NANC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGCV or NANC?
NANC has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs NANC -20.9%.
Should I hold both CGCV and NANC?
CGCV and NANC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and NANC?
54.2% of CGCV's money is in holdings NANC also owns. 41.6% of NANC's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 89 in NANC.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or NANC?
CGCV yields 1.59% while NANC yields 0.18%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NANC better than CGCV?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.