CGCV vs NUDG

CGCV vs NUDG

Which is better, CGCV or NUDG?

CGCV has been ahead.

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.

Lower Fees: CGCVHigher Returns (1Y): CGCVLess Concentrated: CGCV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGCVNUDG
Expense Ratio0.33%Best0.61%
AUM$2.1B$6.2B
Dividend Yield1.59%0.50%
Holdings14643
YTD Return+8.70%Best+2.67%
1Y Return+11.37%-
Top 10 Weight33.0%Best42.3%
Fund FamilyCapital Group (US)Nuveen
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 25, 2024Jun 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CGCV vs NUDG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare CGCV against instead:CGCV vs SPYCGCV vs QQQCGCV vs VOOCGCV vs VTINUDG against:NUDG vs VXUS

CGCV vs NUDG Performance

Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, CGCV is up 8.70% versus a gain of 2.67% for NUDG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CGCV charges 0.33% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $61 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 0.50% for NUDG.

Holdings Overlap

CGCV already in NUDG41.4%
NUDG already in CGCV61.9%

41.4% of CGCV's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 61.9% of NUDG's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

22 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 146 and 43.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 20 positions for NUDG that do not appear in our book for CGCV (37.0% of the fund), and 48 for CGCV that do not appear in NUDG (55.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CGCVWeight in NUDGDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.20%7.67%1.47%
AAPLApple, Inc3.07%6.37%3.30%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.04%5.11%1.07%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd2.11%4.47%2.36%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.40%3.72%1.32%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.3.41%2.04%1.37%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A0.99%3.83%2.84%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.66%1.89%0.77%
SBUXStarbucks Corp2.48%1.88%0.60%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares1.51%2.45%0.94%

61.9% of NUDG is already inside CGCV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CGCVNUDG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CGCV or NUDG?

CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while NUDG charges 0.61%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and NUDG?

61.9% of NUDG's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 61.9% of NUDG's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 42 in NUDG.

Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or NUDG?

CGCV yields 1.59% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NUDG better than CGCV?

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.