CGCV vs RVRB
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs Reverb ETF
Which is better, CGCV or RVRB?
Each has led over a different period.
RVRB has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over the full window, RVRB over 1Y. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | RVRB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.30%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 146 | 499 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6%Best | 11.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1%Best | -19.1% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,156Best | $11,992 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0%Best | 38.2% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Reverb ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Nov 3, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 202 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. CGCV has data through Oct 14, 2026 and RVRB through Mar 26, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Mar 26, 2026 (1.7 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVRB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.4% compared with 10.6% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -19.1% for RVRB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while RVRB charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $30 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 0.86% for RVRB.
Holdings Overlap
92.0% of CGCV's money is in holdings RVRB also owns. 48.2% of RVRB's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.
Most of CGCV is already inside RVRB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 276 days apart, CGCV as of Oct 3, 2026 and RVRB as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
67 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 493 in RVRB, against full books of 146 and 499.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 378 positions for RVRB that do not appear in our book for CGCV (47.8% of the fund), and 3 for CGCV that do not appear in RVRB (3.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGCV | Weight in RVRB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.20% | 5.92% | 0.28% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.16% | 6.78% | 4.62% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.07% | 5.40% | 2.33% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.91% | 6.28% | 4.37% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.04% | 2.52% | 1.52% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.72% | 2.13% | 0.59% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.00% | 1.42% | 1.58% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.41% | 0.42% | 2.99% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.40% | 1.27% | 1.13% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.00% | 0.46% | 2.54% |
92.0% of CGCV is already inside RVRB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or RVRB?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while RVRB charges 0.30%. RVRB is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, CGCV or RVRB?
RVRB has been the more volatile fund at 11.4% annualized versus 10.6% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs RVRB -19.1%.
Should I hold both CGCV and RVRB?
CGCV and RVRB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and RVRB?
92.0% of CGCV's money is in holdings RVRB also owns. 48.2% of RVRB's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 67 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 493 in RVRB.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or RVRB?
CGCV yields 1.59% while RVRB yields 0.86%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RVRB better than CGCV?
RVRB has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over the full window, RVRB over 1Y. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.