CGCV vs XLSR

CGCV vs XLSR

Which is better, CGCV or XLSR?

Each has led over a different period.

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over the full window, XLSR over 1Y. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 85.3%.

Lower Fees: CGCVHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: CGCV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGCVXLSR
Expense Ratio0.33%Best0.70%
AUM$2.1B$1.1B
Dividend Yield1.59%0.45%
Holdings14626
YTD Return+8.70%Best+7.62%
1Y Return+11.37%+12.95%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.39%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.72%
Volatility (annualized)9.9%Best12.0%
Max Drawdown-13.1%Best-20.6%
$10,000 over 2.3 years$13,706Best$13,311
Top 10 Weight33.0%Best85.3%
Fund FamilyCapital Group (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 25, 2024Apr 2, 2019

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).

CGCV vs XLSR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.

Compare CGCV against instead:CGCV vs SPYCGCV vs QQQCGCV vs VOOCGCV vs VTIXLSR against:XLSR vs VXUS

CGCV vs XLSR Performance

Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and State Street US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% while XLSR returned +12.95%. Year to date, CGCV is up 8.70% versus a gain of 7.62% for XLSR.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XLSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -20.6% for XLSR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CGCV charges 0.33% per year while XLSR charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $70 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 0.45% for XLSR.

Holdings Overlap

CGCV already in XLSR22.0%
XLSR already in CGCV21.6%

22.0% of CGCV's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 21.6% of XLSR's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.

CGCV and XLSR share little of their money.

7 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 25 in XLSR, against full books of 146 and 26.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 73 and 25 positions we hold weights for.

CGCV holds 62 positions XLSR does not, 72.7% of the fund.

Largest: PM 3.41%, CSCO 3.00%, LLY 3.00%, ABBV 2.66%, SBUX 2.48%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CGCVWeight in XLSRDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.20%2.98%3.22%
AAPLApple, Inc3.07%4.12%1.05%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.91%5.17%3.26%
NVDANvidia Corp2.16%4.47%2.31%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.72%3.03%0.31%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.04%1.41%2.63%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.1.92%0.41%1.51%

22.0% of CGCV is already inside XLSR.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CGCVXLSR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CGCV or XLSR?

CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while XLSR charges 0.70%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CGCV or XLSR?

Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% vs +12.95% for XLSR, so XLSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGCV annualized +14.69% vs +13.24% for XLSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CGCV or XLSR?

XLSR has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs XLSR -20.6%.

Should I hold both CGCV and XLSR?

CGCV and XLSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and XLSR?

22.0% of CGCV's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 21.6% of XLSR's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 25 in XLSR.

Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or XLSR?

CGCV yields 1.59% while XLSR yields 0.45%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XLSR better than CGCV?

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over the full window, XLSR over 1Y. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 85.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.