CGDG vs IVV
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CGDG or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CGDG is less concentrated, with 26.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGDG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.7B | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.35% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 110 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.00% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.73% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.73% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.5%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,926 | $18,500Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.0%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
CGDG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
CGDG vs IVV Performance
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CGDG returned +10.73% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, CGDG is up 6.00% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, CGDG compounded at +16.73% per year against +22.46% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 8.9% for CGDG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.5% for CGDG and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGDG charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGDG currently yields 2.35% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
44.8% of CGDG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 20.1% of IVV's money is in holdings CGDG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
40 positions in common, counted across the 104 positions we hold weights for in CGDG and 506 in IVV, against full books of 110 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 460 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CGDG (79.3% of the fund), and 9 for CGDG that do not appear in IVV (6.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGDG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.04% | 5.76% | 4.72% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.02% | 2.47% | 1.55% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 4.01% | 0.44% | 3.57% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.08% | 0.69% | 1.39% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.13% | 1.34% | 0.21% |
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 2.17% | 0.25% | 1.92% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.08% | 1.02% | 0.06% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.45% | 0.54% | 0.91% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.48% | 0.38% | 1.10% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.83% | 0.94% | 0.11% |
44.8% of CGDG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGDG or IVV?
CGDG has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGDG or IVV?
Over the past year CGDG returned +10.73% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGDG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 8.9% for CGDG. Worst drawdown: CGDG -10.5% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both CGDG and IVV?
CGDG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGDG and IVV?
44.8% of CGDG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 20.1% of IVV's is in holdings CGDG also owns. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 104 positions we hold weights for in CGDG and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGDG or IVV?
CGDG yields 2.35% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CGDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CGDG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CGDG is less concentrated, with 26.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.