CGDV vs LSVD
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF vs LSV Disciplined Value ETF
Which is better, CGDV or LSVD?
LSVD has been ahead.
CGDV has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGDV | LSVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $39.3B | $678M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 0.27% |
| Holdings | 116 | 136 |
| YTD Return | +12.74% | +20.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.20% | +30.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.22% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 13.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,308 | $14,810Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.1% | 35.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | LSV Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
CGDV vs LSVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
CGDV vs LSVD Performance
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management. Over the past year CGDV returned +19.20% while LSVD returned +30.07%. Year to date, CGDV is up 12.74% versus a gain of 20.92% for LSVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 11.8% for CGDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for CGDV and -19.3% for LSVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGDV charges 0.33% per year while LSVD charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $40 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGDV currently yields 1.23% against 0.27% for LSVD.
Holdings Overlap
53.2% of CGDV's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 39.5% of LSVD's money is in holdings CGDV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
20 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in CGDV and 135 in LSVD, against full books of 116 and 136.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 113 positions for LSVD that do not appear in our book for CGDV (60.1% of the fund), and 28 for CGDV that do not appear in LSVD (38.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGDV | Weight in LSVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.17% | 6.81% | 0.36% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.00% | 3.33% | 4.67% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.30% | 2.80% | 2.50% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.31% | 5.62% | 3.31% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.66% | 3.61% | 0.05% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.83% | 1.07% | 3.76% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.18% | 3.67% | 1.49% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.78% | 1.59% | 1.19% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.14% | 1.90% | 0.24% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 3.23% | 0.39% | 2.84% |
53.2% of CGDV is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGDV or LSVD?
CGDV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while LSVD charges 0.40%. CGDV is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGDV or LSVD?
Over the past year CGDV returned +19.20% vs +30.07% for LSVD, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGDV annualized +22.02% vs +24.38% for LSVD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGDV or LSVD?
LSVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 11.8% for CGDV. Worst drawdown: CGDV -14.3% vs LSVD -19.3%.
Should I hold both CGDV and LSVD?
CGDV and LSVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGDV and LSVD?
53.2% of CGDV's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 39.5% of LSVD's is in holdings CGDV also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in CGDV and 135 in LSVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGDV or LSVD?
CGDV yields 1.23% while LSVD yields 0.27%, so CGDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSVD better than CGDV?
CGDV has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.