CGDV vs SIXA
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF vs ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, CGDV or SIXA?
Each has led over a different period.
CGDV has a lower expense ratio. CGDV led over 3Y and the full window, SIXA over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. SIXA is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGDV | SIXA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.47% |
| AUM | $39.3B | $540M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 1.96% |
| Holdings | 116 | 150 |
| YTD Return | +12.74% | +16.78%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.20% | +19.27%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.22%Best | +21.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -16.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $21,295Best | $18,508 |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.1% | 34.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | 6 Meridian ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 11, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGDV vs SIXA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGDV vs SIXA Performance
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF. Over the past year CGDV returned +19.20% while SIXA returned +19.27%. Year to date, CGDV is up 12.74% versus a gain of 16.78% for SIXA.
Over three years, CGDV compounded at +24.22% per year against +21.22% for SIXA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 12.4% for SIXA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for CGDV and -16.7% for SIXA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGDV charges 0.33% per year while SIXA charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $47 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGDV currently yields 1.23% against 1.96% for SIXA.
Holdings Overlap
41.2% of CGDV's money is in holdings SIXA also owns. 36.4% of SIXA's money is in holdings CGDV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in CGDV and 50 in SIXA, against full books of 116 and 150.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 31 positions for SIXA that do not appear in our book for CGDV (63.6% of the fund), and 29 for CGDV that do not appear in SIXA (50.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGDV | Weight in SIXA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.17% | 1.44% | 5.73% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.30% | 1.71% | 3.59% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.71% | 5.18% | 4.47% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.66% | 1.37% | 2.29% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 2.26% | 2.23% | 0.03% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.80% | 2.67% | 0.87% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 1.46% | 2.69% | 1.23% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.78% | 1.36% | 1.42% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.88% | 3.13% | 2.25% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.14% | 1.62% | 0.52% |
41.2% of CGDV is already inside SIXA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGDV or SIXA?
CGDV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while SIXA charges 0.47%. CGDV is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGDV or SIXA?
Over the past year CGDV returned +19.20% vs +19.27% for SIXA, so SIXA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGDV or SIXA?
CGDV has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 12.4% for SIXA. Worst drawdown: CGDV -21.8% vs SIXA -16.7%.
Should I hold both CGDV and SIXA?
CGDV and SIXA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGDV and SIXA?
41.2% of CGDV's money is in holdings SIXA also owns. 36.4% of SIXA's is in holdings CGDV also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in CGDV and 50 in SIXA.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGDV or SIXA?
CGDV yields 1.23% while SIXA yields 1.96%, so SIXA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SIXA better than CGDV?
CGDV has a lower expense ratio. CGDV led over 3Y and the full window, SIXA over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. SIXA is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.