CGDV vs WBIF
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, CGDV or WBIF?
CGDV has been ahead.
CGDV has a lower expense ratio. CGDV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGDV | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $39.3B | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 116 | 152 |
| YTD Return | +12.74% | +14.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.20%Best | +15.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.22%Best | +10.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -20.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $21,295Best | $12,201 |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGDV vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGDV vs WBIF Performance
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year CGDV returned +19.20% while WBIF returned +15.37%. Year to date, CGDV is up 12.74% versus a gain of 14.87% for WBIF.
Over three years, CGDV compounded at +24.22% per year against +10.35% for WBIF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 13.0% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for CGDV and -20.3% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGDV charges 0.33% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $165 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGDV currently yields 1.23% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 6.8% of CGDV's money is in holdings WBIF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WBIF, our book for it covers 83.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
CGDV and WBIF share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in CGDV and 62 in WBIF, against full books of 116 and 152.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGDV and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGDV or WBIF?
CGDV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while WBIF charges 1.65%. CGDV is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGDV or WBIF?
Over the past year CGDV returned +19.20% vs +15.37% for WBIF, so CGDV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGDV or WBIF?
CGDV has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 13.0% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: CGDV -21.8% vs WBIF -20.3%.
Should I hold both CGDV and WBIF?
CGDV and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGDV and WBIF?
At least 6.8% of CGDV's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. Our book for WBIF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in CGDV and 62 in WBIF.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGDV or WBIF?
CGDV yields 1.23% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so CGDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than CGDV?
CGDV has a lower expense ratio. CGDV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.