CGGO vs FRWD
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF
Which is better, CGGO or FRWD?
CGGO costs less.
CGGO has a lower expense ratio. CGGO is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGO | FRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $11.9B | $274M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 106 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +8.88% | +24.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.88% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.50% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.9%Best | 56.0% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Jan 13, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
CGGO vs FRWD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CGGO vs FRWD Performance
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd. Year to date, CGGO is up 8.88% versus a gain of 24.83% for FRWD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGO charges 0.47% per year while FRWD charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $65 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGO currently yields 1.00% against 0.00% for FRWD.
Holdings Overlap
34.3% of CGGO's money is in holdings FRWD also owns. 52.6% of FRWD's money is in holdings CGGO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in CGGO and 26 in FRWD, against full books of 106 and 54.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for FRWD that do not appear in our book for CGGO (35.4% of the fund), and 40 for CGGO that do not appear in FRWD (33.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGO | Weight in FRWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 7.09% | 6.22% | 0.87% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.29% | 9.32% | 8.03% |
| ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares | 3.17% | 4.76% | 1.59% |
| 005930:KRSamsung Electronics (Equity) | 3.01% | 4.29% | 1.28% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.44% | 3.52% | 0.08% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.49% | 3.42% | 0.07% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.39% | 3.18% | 0.21% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 2.57% | 3.93% | 1.36% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.75% | 3.54% | 0.79% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.38% | 2.89% | 0.51% |
52.6% of FRWD is already inside CGGO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGO or FRWD?
CGGO has an expense ratio of 0.47% while FRWD charges 0.65%. CGGO is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGO and FRWD?
52.6% of FRWD's money is in holdings CGGO also owns. 52.6% of FRWD's is in holdings CGGO also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in CGGO and 26 in FRWD.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGO or FRWD?
CGGO yields 1.00% while FRWD yields 0.00%, so CGGO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FRWD better than CGGO?
CGGO has a lower expense ratio. CGGO is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.