CII vs WGMI
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc vs CoinShares Bitcoin Mining and Digital Power ETF
Which is better, CII or WGMI?
Each has led over a different period.
WGMI has a lower expense ratio. CII led over 1Y and the full window, WGMI over 3Y. CII is less concentrated, with 46.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CII | WGMI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $194M |
| Dividend Yield | 16.23% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 142 | 57 |
| YTD Return | +7.51%Best | -19.60% |
| 1Y Return | +19.64%Best | -47.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.21% | +55.28%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.91% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3%Best | 92.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1%Best | -85.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $18,345Best | $12,583 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.3%Best | 63.4% |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Valkyrie Funds |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Apr 27, 2004 | Feb 7, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 8, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.7 years).
CII vs WGMI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
CII vs WGMI Performance
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc (CII) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and CoinShares Bitcoin Mining and Digital Power ETF (WGMI) is an ETF from Valkyrie Funds. Over the past year CII returned +19.64% while WGMI returned -47.00%. Year to date, CII is up 7.51% versus a loss of 19.60% for WGMI.
Over three years, CII compounded at +20.21% per year against +55.28% for WGMI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WGMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 92.7% compared with 18.3% for CII. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for CII and -85.8% for WGMI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CII charges 0.93% per year while WGMI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $75 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CII currently yields 16.23% against 0.00% for WGMI.
Holdings Overlap
7.3% of CII's money is in holdings WGMI also owns. 2.8% of WGMI's money is in holdings CII also owns.
CII and WGMI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 94 days apart, CII as of Jun 30, 2026 and WGMI as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in CII and 28 in WGMI, against full books of 142 and 57.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for WGMI that do not appear in our book for CII (60.6% of the fund), and 36 for CII that do not appear in WGMI (90.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CII | Weight in WGMI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.33% | 2.80% | 4.53% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CII and WGMI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CII or WGMI?
CII has an expense ratio of 0.93% while WGMI charges 0.75%. WGMI is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CII or WGMI?
Over the past year CII returned +19.64% vs -47.00% for WGMI, so CII leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CII or WGMI?
WGMI has been the more volatile fund at 92.7% annualized versus 18.3% for CII. Worst drawdown: CII -21.1% vs WGMI -85.8%.
Should I hold both CII and WGMI?
CII and WGMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CII and WGMI?
7.3% of CII's money is in holdings WGMI also owns. 2.8% of WGMI's is in holdings CII also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in CII and 28 in WGMI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CII or WGMI?
CII yields 16.23% while WGMI yields 0.00%, so CII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WGMI better than CII?
WGMI has a lower expense ratio. CII led over 1Y and the full window, WGMI over 3Y. CII is less concentrated, with 46.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.