CNEQ vs NBGX
Alger Concentrated Equity ETF vs Neuberger Berman Growth ETF
Which is better, CNEQ or NBGX?
CNEQ has been ahead.
NBGX has a lower expense ratio. CNEQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNEQ | NBGX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $4.8B | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.38% |
| Holdings | 32 | 112 |
| YTD Return | +14.00%Best | +8.10% |
| 1Y Return | +13.77%Best | +9.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.3% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.6% | -21.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $15,185Best | $12,451 |
| Fund Family | Alger | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 4, 2024 | Dec 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 19, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
CNEQ vs NBGX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
CNEQ vs NBGX Performance
Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) is an ETF from Alger and Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust. Over the past year CNEQ returned +13.77% while NBGX returned +9.56%. Year to date, CNEQ is up 14.00% versus a gain of 8.10% for NBGX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.3% compared with 15.8% for NBGX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.6% for CNEQ and -21.6% for NBGX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNEQ charges 0.56% per year while NBGX charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $44 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNEQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.38% for NBGX.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of NBGX's money is in holdings CNEQ also owns.
Stated as a floor: for CNEQ, our book for it covers 1.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CNEQ and 58 in NBGX, against full books of 32 and 112.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CNEQ | Weight in NBGX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.79% | 0.28% | 1.51% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CNEQ and NBGX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNEQ or NBGX?
CNEQ has an expense ratio of 0.56% while NBGX charges 0.44%. NBGX is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CNEQ or NBGX?
Over the past year CNEQ returned +13.77% vs +9.56% for NBGX, so CNEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CNEQ annualized +26.12% vs +12.95% for NBGX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CNEQ or NBGX?
CNEQ has been the more volatile fund at 25.3% annualized versus 15.8% for NBGX. Worst drawdown: CNEQ -27.6% vs NBGX -21.6%.
Should I hold both CNEQ and NBGX?
CNEQ and NBGX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNEQ or NBGX?
CNEQ yields 0.44% while NBGX yields 0.38%, so CNEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBGX better than CNEQ?
NBGX has a lower expense ratio. CNEQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.