CORD vs SCHD
T-REX 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, CORD or SCHD?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORD | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $111.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.24% |
| Holdings | 5 | 206 |
| YTD Return | -85.21% | +24.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | -77.20% | +29.85%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 216.8% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -6.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $1,824 | $12,676Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
CORD vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
CORD vs SCHD Performance
T-REX 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) is an ETF from REX Shares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CORD returned -77.20% while SCHD returned +29.85%. Year to date, CORD is down 85.21% versus a gain of 24.55% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CORD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 216.8% compared with 14.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for CORD and -6.9% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORD charges 1.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $6 annually, a gap of $144 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORD currently yields 0.00% against 3.24% for SCHD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CORD and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORD or SCHD?
CORD has an expense ratio of 1.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $144 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CORD or SCHD?
Over the past year CORD returned -77.20% vs +29.85% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CORD annualized -81.76% vs +26.76% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CORD or SCHD?
CORD has been the more volatile fund at 216.8% annualized versus 14.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: CORD -96.3% vs SCHD -6.9%.
Should I hold both CORD and SCHD?
CORD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORD or SCHD?
CORD yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.24%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than CORD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.