CORD vs VXUS

CORD vs VXUS

Which is better, CORD or VXUS?

Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: VXUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCORDVXUS
Expense Ratio1.50%0.05%Best
AUM$19M$163.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.34%
Holdings58,844
YTD Return-85.21%+10.00%Best
1Y Return-77.20%+17.01%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.55%
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.55%
Volatility (annualized)216.8%14.2%Best
Max Drawdown-96.3%-11.3%Best
$10,000 over 1 years$1,824$11,696Best
Fund FamilyREX SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 26, 2025Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).

CORD vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CORD vs VXUS Performance

T-REX 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CORD returned -77.20% while VXUS returned +17.01%. Year to date, CORD is down 85.21% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CORD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 216.8% compared with 14.2% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for CORD and -11.3% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CORD charges 1.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $5 annually, a gap of $145 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORD currently yields 0.00% against 2.34% for VXUS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CORD and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CORDVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CORD or VXUS?

CORD has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $145 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CORD or VXUS?

Over the past year CORD returned -77.20% vs +17.01% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CORD annualized -81.76% vs +16.96% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CORD or VXUS?

CORD has been the more volatile fund at 216.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CORD -96.3% vs VXUS -11.3%.

Should I hold both CORD and VXUS?

CORD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CORD or VXUS?

CORD yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than CORD?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.