CWS vs HFUL

CWS vs HFUL

Which is better, CWS or HFUL?

HFUL costs less.

HFUL has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: HFUL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCWSHFUL
Expense Ratio0.65%0.60%Best
AUM$119M-
Dividend Yield0.32%-
Holdings27-
YTD Price Return-2.08%-
1Y Price Return-1.20%-
3Y Price Return (annualized)+9.12%-
5Y Price Return (annualized)+7.17%-
Volatility (annualized)16.4%-
Max Drawdown-33.8%-
Fund FamilyAdvisor SharesNew Age Alpha
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthMid Cap Growth
InceptionSep 20, 2016Nov 22, 2019

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for HFUL. We have no price series for HFUL, so there is nothing to compare it against.

Compare CWS against instead:CWS vs SPYCWS vs QQQCWS vs VOOCWS vs VTIHFUL against:HFUL vs VXUS

CWS vs HFUL Performance

AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and New Age Alpha UK Leading ETF (HFUL) is an ETF from New Age Alpha.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CWS charges 0.65% per year while HFUL charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $60 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CWS and HFUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CWSHFUL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CWS or HFUL?

CWS has an expense ratio of 0.65% while HFUL charges 0.60%. HFUL is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Is HFUL better than CWS?

HFUL has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.