DCOR vs VOO

DCOR vs VOO

Which is better, DCOR or VOO?

Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. DCOR led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDCORVOO
Expense Ratio0.14%0.03%Best
AUM$45.6B$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.91%1.06%
Holdings2,404506
YTD Return+13.63%Best+13.57%
1Y Return+17.92%Best+17.55%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.02%+22.46%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Volatility (annualized)12.3%Tie12.3%Tie
Max Drawdown-19.1%-18.7%Best
$10,000 over 3.1 years$17,345$18,024Best
Fund FamilyDimensionalVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 15, 2005Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).

DCOR vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

DCOR vs VOO Performance

Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) is an ETF from Dimensional and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DCOR returned +17.92% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, DCOR is up 13.63% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.

Over three years, DCOR compounded at +21.02% per year against +22.46% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DCOR and VOO have been equally volatile, both at 12.3% annualized.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for DCOR and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DCOR charges 0.14% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DCOR currently yields 0.91% against 1.06% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 543 holdings in DCOR and 504 in VOO, totalling 80.8% and 100.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 543 positions we hold weights for in DCOR and 504 in VOO, against full books of 2,404 and 506.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DCOR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DCORVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DCOR or VOO?

DCOR has an expense ratio of 0.14% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DCOR or VOO?

Over the past year DCOR returned +17.92% vs +17.55% for VOO, so DCOR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DCOR or VOO?

DCOR and VOO have been equally volatile, both at 12.3% annualized. Worst drawdown: DCOR -19.1% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both DCOR and VOO?

DCOR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DCOR or VOO?

DCOR yields 0.91% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than DCOR?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. DCOR led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.