DFAS vs RESM
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF
Which is better, DFAS or RESM?
DFAS costs less.
DFAS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFAS | RESM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27%Best | 0.32% |
| AUM | $34.2B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 0.08% |
| Holdings | 2,060 | 2,051 |
| YTD Return | +10.62% | +13.69%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.08% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.46% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.05% | - |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 1998 | Dec 11, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
DFAS vs RESM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DFAS vs RESM Performance
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is an ETF from Dimensional and Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, DFAS is up 10.62% versus a gain of 13.69% for RESM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFAS charges 0.27% per year while RESM charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $32 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFAS currently yields 1.04% against 0.08% for RESM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1,552 holdings in DFAS and 25 in RESM, totalling 93.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1,552 positions we hold weights for in DFAS and 25 in RESM, against full books of 2,060 and 2,051.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DFAS and RESM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFAS or RESM?
DFAS has an expense ratio of 0.27% while RESM charges 0.32%. DFAS is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFAS or RESM?
DFAS yields 1.04% while RESM yields 0.08%, so DFAS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RESM better than DFAS?
DFAS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.