DLCU vs ERNZ
DFA US Large Company ETF vs TrueShares Active Yield ETF
Which is better, DLCU or ERNZ?
DLCU costs less.
DLCU has a lower expense ratio. ERNZ is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DLCU | ERNZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 3.25% |
| AUM | $14.7B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 8.71% |
| Holdings | 509 | 144 |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 9.6% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -14.2% |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1% | 22.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | TrueShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 4, 2026 | Apr 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 204 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DLCU has data through Oct 14, 2026 and ERNZ through Mar 24, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DLCU charges 0.06% per year while ERNZ charges 3.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $325 annually, a gap of $319 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DLCU currently yields 0.17% against 8.71% for ERNZ.
Holdings Overlap
4.4% of DLCU's money is in holdings ERNZ also owns. 18.0% of ERNZ's money is in holdings DLCU also owns.
ERNZ and DLCU share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 228 days apart, DLCU as of Sep 15, 2026 and ERNZ as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
31 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in DLCU and 141 in ERNZ, against full books of 509 and 144.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 101 positions for ERNZ that do not appear in our book for DLCU (74.4% of the fund), and 462 for DLCU that do not appear in ERNZ (94.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DLCU | Weight in ERNZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 0.09% | 2.05% | 1.96% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.69% | 0.96% | 0.27% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.27% | 1.13% | 0.86% |
| PGRProgressive Corporation | 0.19% | 1.20% | 1.01% |
| GISGeneral Mills In | 0.03% | 0.98% | 0.95% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.54% | 0.36% | 0.18% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.28% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 0.08% | 0.82% | 0.74% |
| CLXClorox Co. | 0.02% | 0.86% | 0.84% |
| ROLRollins Inc. | 0.02% | 0.84% | 0.82% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DLCU and ERNZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DLCU or ERNZ?
DLCU has an expense ratio of 0.06% while ERNZ charges 3.25%. DLCU is the cheaper option, by $319 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between DLCU and ERNZ?
18.0% of ERNZ's money is in holdings DLCU also owns. 18.0% of ERNZ's is in holdings DLCU also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in DLCU and 141 in ERNZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DLCU or ERNZ?
DLCU yields 0.17% while ERNZ yields 8.71%, so ERNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ERNZ better than DLCU?
DLCU has a lower expense ratio. ERNZ is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.