DMXF vs VTI
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DMXF or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DMXF is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMXF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.19% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 413 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +10.61% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.45% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.70% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.92% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,639 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.1%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 18, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.3 years).
DMXF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.
DMXF vs VTI Performance
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DMXF returned +14.45% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, DMXF is up 10.61% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, DMXF compounded at +18.70% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.92% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +16.19% annualized vs +11.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for DMXF and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMXF charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMXF currently yields 4.19% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of DMXF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's money is in holdings DMXF also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
4 positions in common, counted across the 397 positions we hold weights for in DMXF and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 413 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,154 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DMXF (97.1% of the fund), and 7 for DMXF that do not appear in VTI (1.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DMXF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMXF or VTI?
DMXF has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DMXF or VTI?
Over the past year DMXF returned +14.45% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), DMXF annualized +11.27% vs +16.19% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DMXF or VTI?
DMXF has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DMXF -34.5% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both DMXF and VTI?
DMXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMXF or VTI?
DMXF yields 4.19% while VTI yields 1.06%, so DMXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DMXF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DMXF is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.