DMXU vs QQQ
Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DMXU or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
DMXU has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DMXU is less concentrated, with 16.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMXU | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $65M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.87% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 360 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +5.39% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.30% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.70% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.53% | +15.42%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Best | 20.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,720 | $20,484Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.2%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.9 years).
DMXU vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
DMXU vs QQQ Performance
Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF (DMXU) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DMXU returned +10.30% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, DMXU is up 5.39% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, DMXU compounded at +14.70% per year against +26.18% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.53% and +15.42% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.66% annualized vs +8.04%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 16.2% for DMXU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for DMXU and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMXU charges 0.03% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMXU currently yields 3.87% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
3.5% of DMXU's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings DMXU also owns.
DMXU and QQQ share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 624 positions we hold weights for in DMXU and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 360 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DMXU (96.3% of the fund), and 10 for DMXU that do not appear in QQQ (1.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DMXU and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMXU or QQQ?
DMXU has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQ charges 0.18%. DMXU is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DMXU or QQQ?
Over the past year DMXU returned +10.30% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DMXU annualized +8.04% vs +20.66% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DMXU or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 16.2% for DMXU. Worst drawdown: DMXU -32.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both DMXU and QQQ?
DMXU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DMXU and QQQ?
3.5% of DMXU's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.6% of QQQ's is in holdings DMXU also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 624 positions we hold weights for in DMXU and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMXU or QQQ?
DMXU yields 3.87% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so DMXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DMXU?
DMXU has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DMXU is less concentrated, with 16.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.