DSTL vs FDIV
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF
Which is better, DSTL or FDIV?
DSTL has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 18.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | FDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 2.61% |
| Holdings | 300 | 224 |
| YTD Return | +13.34%Best | -0.05% |
| 1Y Return | +16.45%Best | +2.12% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.03%Best | +6.26% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.92% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9%Best | -18.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,261Best | $11,722 |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.3%Best | 33.0% |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | Sep 19, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
DSTL vs FDIV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
DSTL vs FDIV Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% while FDIV returned +2.12%. Year to date, DSTL is up 13.34% versus a loss of 0.05% for FDIV.
Over three years, DSTL compounded at +15.03% per year against +6.26% for FDIV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 12.8% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for DSTL and -18.6% for FDIV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while FDIV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $35 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.14% against 2.61% for FDIV.
Holdings Overlap
20.1% of DSTL's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 11.1% of FDIV's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.
DSTL and FDIV share little of their money.
17 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 111 in FDIV, against full books of 300 and 224.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for FDIV that do not appear in our book for DSTL (86.9% of the fund), and 83 for DSTL that do not appear in FDIV (79.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSTL | Weight in FDIV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNHUnited Health Group Inc. | 1.98% | 2.75% | 0.77% |
| ACNAccenture Plc, Class a | 1.97% | 1.21% | 0.76% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.84% | 1.04% | 0.80% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 1.47% | 0.71% | 0.76% |
| CICigna Corp. | 1.36% | 0.61% | 0.75% |
| CMEC M E Group Inc. | 1.07% | 0.89% | 0.18% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 1.19% | 0.75% | 0.44% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp | 0.95% | 0.76% | 0.19% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy | 1.35% | 0.31% | 1.04% |
| AJGArthur J Gallagher & Co. | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.57% |
20.1% of DSTL is already inside FDIV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or FDIV?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while FDIV charges 0.35%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSTL or FDIV?
Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% vs +2.12% for FDIV, so DSTL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSTL or FDIV?
DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 12.8% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: DSTL -16.9% vs FDIV -18.6%.
Should I hold both DSTL and FDIV?
DSTL and FDIV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and FDIV?
20.1% of DSTL's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 11.1% of FDIV's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 111 in FDIV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or FDIV?
DSTL yields 1.14% while FDIV yields 2.61%, so FDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDIV better than DSTL?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 18.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.