DSTL vs OAKM
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs Oakmark US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, DSTL or OAKM?
Each has led over a different period.
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, OAKM over the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 18.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | OAKM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 0.65% |
| Holdings | 300 | 41 |
| YTD Return | +13.34%Best | +6.05% |
| 1Y Return | +16.45%Best | +14.80% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.03% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.92% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -15.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $11,630 | $12,344Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.3%Best | 35.0% |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | Oakmark Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | Dec 3, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
DSTL vs OAKM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
DSTL vs OAKM Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds. Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% while OAKM returned +14.80%. Year to date, DSTL is up 13.34% versus a gain of 6.05% for OAKM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 12.2% for OAKM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for DSTL and -15.2% for OAKM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while OAKM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.14% against 0.65% for OAKM.
Holdings Overlap
8.9% of DSTL's money is in holdings OAKM also owns. 16.4% of OAKM's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.
OAKM and DSTL share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 39 in OAKM, against full books of 300 and 41.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 30 positions for OAKM that do not appear in our book for DSTL (76.5% of the fund), and 94 for DSTL that do not appear in OAKM (90.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DSTL and OAKM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or OAKM?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while OAKM charges 0.59%. DSTL is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSTL or OAKM?
Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% vs +14.80% for OAKM, so DSTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DSTL annualized +8.27% vs +11.72% for OAKM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSTL or OAKM?
DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 12.2% for OAKM. Worst drawdown: DSTL -16.7% vs OAKM -15.2%.
Should I hold both DSTL and OAKM?
DSTL and OAKM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and OAKM?
16.4% of OAKM's money is in holdings DSTL also owns. 16.4% of OAKM's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 39 in OAKM.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or OAKM?
DSTL yields 1.14% while OAKM yields 0.65%, so DSTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OAKM better than DSTL?
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, OAKM over the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 18.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.