DSTL vs WBIF
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, DSTL or WBIF?
DSTL has been ahead.
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $2.0B | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 300 | 152 |
| YTD Return | +13.34% | +14.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.45%Best | +15.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.03%Best | +10.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.92%Best | +4.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -20.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,790Best | $12,172 |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8 years).
DSTL vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
DSTL vs WBIF Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% while WBIF returned +15.37%. Year to date, DSTL is up 13.34% versus a gain of 14.87% for WBIF.
Over three years, DSTL compounded at +15.03% per year against +10.35% for WBIF; over five years the annualized figures are +10.92% and +4.01% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, DSTL has the edge at +14.39% annualized vs +3.71%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 13.0% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for DSTL and -20.3% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $165 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.14% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 8.3% of DSTL's money is in holdings WBIF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WBIF, our book for it covers 83.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
DSTL and WBIF share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 62 in WBIF, against full books of 300 and 152.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSTL | Weight in WBIF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACNAccenture Plc | 1.97% | 1.26% | 0.71% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing Inc. | 1.19% | 1.50% | 0.31% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 1.10% | 1.22% | 0.12% |
| AVYAvery Dennison Corp. | 0.84% | 1.48% | 0.64% |
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 1.09% | 1.18% | 0.09% |
| TTCToro Co/the | 0.70% | 1.50% | 0.80% |
| RMDResmed Inc. | 0.71% | 1.11% | 0.40% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.73% | 0.89% | 0.16% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DSTL and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or WBIF?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while WBIF charges 1.65%. DSTL is the cheaper option, by $126 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSTL or WBIF?
Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% vs +15.37% for WBIF, so DSTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DSTL annualized +14.39% vs +3.71% for WBIF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSTL or WBIF?
DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 13.0% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: DSTL -33.1% vs WBIF -20.3%.
Should I hold both DSTL and WBIF?
DSTL and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and WBIF?
At least 8.3% of DSTL's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. Our book for WBIF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 62 in WBIF.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or WBIF?
DSTL yields 1.14% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so DSTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than DSTL?
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.