DSTL vs WBIG
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Which is better, DSTL or WBIG?
DSTL has been ahead.
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 18.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 23.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | WBIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 1.59% |
| AUM | $2.0B | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 1.17% |
| Holdings | 300 | 159 |
| YTD Return | +13.34%Best | +12.49% |
| 1Y Return | +16.45%Best | +11.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.03%Best | +7.85% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.92%Best | +1.53% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -25.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,790Best | $10,789 |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.3%Best | 23.9% |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8 years).
DSTL vs WBIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
DSTL vs WBIG Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% while WBIG returned +11.17%. Year to date, DSTL is up 13.34% versus a gain of 12.49% for WBIG.
Over three years, DSTL compounded at +15.03% per year against +7.85% for WBIG; over five years the annualized figures are +10.92% and +1.53% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, DSTL has the edge at +14.39% annualized vs +1.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 12.1% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for DSTL and -25.3% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $159 annually, a gap of $120 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.14% against 1.17% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
14.8% of DSTL's money is in holdings WBIG also owns. 15.7% of WBIG's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.
WBIG and DSTL share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 71 in WBIG, against full books of 300 and 159.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 54 positions for WBIG that do not appear in our book for DSTL (76.9% of the fund), and 87 for DSTL that do not appear in WBIG (84.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSTL | Weight in WBIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBYBest Buy Co Inc | 0.97% | 2.22% | 1.25% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 1.97% | 1.17% | 0.80% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.56% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 1.64% | 1.16% | 0.48% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.19% | 1.22% | 0.03% |
| PRPermian Resource | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.17% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 1.10% | 0.96% | 0.14% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 0.88% | 1.18% | 0.30% |
| AVYAvery Dennison Corp. | 0.84% | 1.21% | 0.37% |
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 1.09% | 0.94% | 0.15% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DSTL and WBIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or WBIG?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while WBIG charges 1.59%. DSTL is the cheaper option, by $120 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSTL or WBIG?
Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% vs +11.17% for WBIG, so DSTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DSTL annualized +14.39% vs +1.70% for WBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSTL or WBIG?
DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 12.1% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: DSTL -33.1% vs WBIG -25.3%.
Should I hold both DSTL and WBIG?
DSTL and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and WBIG?
15.7% of WBIG's money is in holdings DSTL also owns. 15.7% of WBIG's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 71 in WBIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or WBIG?
DSTL yields 1.14% while WBIG yields 1.17%, so WBIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIG better than DSTL?
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 18.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 23.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.