DSTL vs ZAP
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, DSTL or ZAP?
Each has led over a different period.
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 18.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DSTL | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $2.0B | $440M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 300 | 94 |
| YTD Return | +13.34%Best | +6.45% |
| 1Y Return | +16.45%Best | +2.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.03% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.92% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9% | -13.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,352 | $13,487Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.3%Best | 44.2% |
| Fund Family | Distillate Capital Etfs | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2018 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
DSTL vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
DSTL vs ZAP Performance
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% while ZAP returned +2.72%. Year to date, DSTL is up 13.34% versus a gain of 6.45% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 13.7% for DSTL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for DSTL and -13.0% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DSTL charges 0.39% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $50 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.14% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
1.2% of DSTL's money is in holdings ZAP also owns. 3.7% of ZAP's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.
ZAP and DSTL share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 300 and 94.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 43 positions for ZAP that do not appear in our book for DSTL (95.0% of the fund), and 99 for DSTL that do not appear in ZAP (98.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DSTL | Weight in ZAP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 1.17% | 3.74% | 2.57% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DSTL and ZAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DSTL or ZAP?
DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while ZAP charges 0.50%. DSTL is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DSTL or ZAP?
Over the past year DSTL returned +16.45% vs +2.72% for ZAP, so DSTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DSTL annualized +12.45% vs +18.08% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DSTL or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 13.7% for DSTL. Worst drawdown: DSTL -14.9% vs ZAP -13.0%.
Should I hold both DSTL and ZAP?
DSTL and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and ZAP?
3.7% of ZAP's money is in holdings DSTL also owns. 3.7% of ZAP's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 45 in ZAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or ZAP?
DSTL yields 1.14% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than DSTL?
DSTL has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. DSTL is less concentrated, with 18.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.