DUHP vs FLCC
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF vs Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, DUHP or FLCC?
FLCC has been ahead.
DUHP has a lower expense ratio. FLCC led over 1Y and the full window. FLCC is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUHP | FLCC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21%Best | 0.29% |
| AUM | $19.7B | $179M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 0.45% |
| Holdings | 160 | 304 |
| YTD Return | +11.84% | +12.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.34% | +16.11%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9%Best | -19.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,290 | $14,419Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.3% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Federated Hermes |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2022 | Jul 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
DUHP vs FLCC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
DUHP vs FLCC Performance
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is an ETF from Dimensional and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) is an ETF from Federated Hermes. Over the past year DUHP returned +13.34% while FLCC returned +16.11%. Year to date, DUHP is up 11.84% versus a gain of 12.79% for FLCC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.0% for DUHP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for DUHP and -19.2% for FLCC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUHP charges 0.21% per year while FLCC charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $29 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUHP currently yields 0.85% against 0.45% for FLCC.
Holdings Overlap
61.1% of DUHP's money is in holdings FLCC also owns. 50.0% of FLCC's money is in holdings DUHP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
49 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 155 in FLCC, against full books of 160 and 304.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 101 positions for FLCC that do not appear in our book for DUHP (49.8% of the fund), and 102 for DUHP that do not appear in FLCC (38.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DUHP | Weight in FLCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.90% | 8.62% | 0.72% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.41% | 6.81% | 0.60% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.90% | 4.21% | 0.69% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.25% | 1.44% | 2.81% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.57% | 1.10% | 3.47% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.32% | 1.23% | 3.09% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.17% | 2.06% | 0.89% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.01% | 2.18% | 1.17% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 1.23% | 1.89% | 0.66% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.18% | 0.66% | 1.52% |
61.1% of DUHP is already inside FLCC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUHP or FLCC?
DUHP has an expense ratio of 0.21% while FLCC charges 0.29%. DUHP is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUHP or FLCC?
Over the past year DUHP returned +13.34% vs +16.11% for FLCC, so FLCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DUHP annualized +13.80% vs +18.10% for FLCC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUHP or FLCC?
FLCC has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.0% for DUHP. Worst drawdown: DUHP -17.9% vs FLCC -19.2%.
Should I hold both DUHP and FLCC?
DUHP and FLCC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DUHP and FLCC?
61.1% of DUHP's money is in holdings FLCC also owns. 50.0% of FLCC's is in holdings DUHP also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 155 in FLCC.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUHP or FLCC?
DUHP yields 0.85% while FLCC yields 0.45%, so DUHP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLCC better than DUHP?
DUHP has a lower expense ratio. FLCC led over 1Y and the full window. FLCC is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.