DURA vs QQQ
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DURA or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DURA is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DURA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $38M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.17% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 140 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +15.33% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.46% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.54% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.62% | +15.42%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 20.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,437 | $20,484Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.2%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8 years).
DURA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
DURA vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF (DURA) is an ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DURA returned +16.46% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, DURA is up 15.33% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, DURA compounded at +11.54% per year against +26.18% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.62% and +15.42% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.61% annualized vs +8.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 14.4% for DURA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DURA and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DURA charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DURA currently yields 3.17% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
18.3% of DURA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings DURA also owns.
DURA and QQQ share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in DURA and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 140 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 82 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DURA (90.7% of the fund), and 68 for DURA that do not appear in QQQ (81.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DURA | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.89% | 0.72% | 3.17% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.19% | 1.07% | 2.12% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.68% | 0.95% | 1.73% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.26% | 0.81% | 1.45% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.07% | 0.77% | 1.30% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 1.31% | 0.31% | 1.00% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 0.74% | 0.18% | 0.56% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors N.V | 0.57% | 0.25% | 0.32% |
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 0.63% | 0.17% | 0.46% |
| MCHPMicrochip Technology Inc. | 0.58% | 0.18% | 0.40% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DURA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DURA or QQQ?
DURA has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DURA or QQQ?
Over the past year DURA returned +16.46% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DURA annualized +8.69% vs +20.61% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DURA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 14.4% for DURA. Worst drawdown: DURA -35.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both DURA and QQQ?
DURA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DURA and QQQ?
18.3% of DURA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.6% of QQQ's is in holdings DURA also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in DURA and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DURA or QQQ?
DURA yields 3.17% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so DURA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DURA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DURA is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.