EGGQ vs FELC
NestYield Visionary ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, EGGQ or FELC?
Each has led over a different period.
FELC has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, FELC over 1Y. FELC is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EGGQ | FELC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $8.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.26% | 0.83% |
| Holdings | 45 | 590 |
| YTD Return | +11.07% | +14.93%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.59% | +19.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.11% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.7% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -18.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,795Best | $13,452 |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.9% | 40.1%Best |
| Fund Family | NestYield | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | Nov 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
EGGQ vs FELC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
EGGQ vs FELC Performance
NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) is an ETF from NestYield and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year EGGQ returned +5.59% while FELC returned +19.54%. Year to date, EGGQ is up 11.07% versus a gain of 14.93% for FELC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.7% compared with 12.4% for FELC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for EGGQ and -18.6% for FELC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EGGQ charges 0.93% per year while FELC charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $18 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGGQ currently yields 8.26% against 0.83% for FELC.
Holdings Overlap
57.2% of EGGQ's money is in holdings FELC also owns. 10.1% of FELC's money is in holdings EGGQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 300 in FELC, against full books of 45 and 590.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 209 positions for FELC that do not appear in our book for EGGQ (89.3% of the fund), and 9 for EGGQ that do not appear in FELC (34.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EGGQ | Weight in FELC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STXSeagate Technolo | 10.52% | 0.35% | 10.17% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 9.67% | 0.00% | 9.67% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.50% | 2.04% | 3.46% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.75% | 3.35% | 0.40% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 5.39% | 0.48% | 4.91% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.84% | 0.99% | 3.85% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 3.96% | 0.00% | 3.96% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.20% | 1.74% | 0.46% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 2.59% | 0.74% | 1.85% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 3.22% | 0.00% | 3.22% |
57.2% of EGGQ is already inside FELC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EGGQ or FELC?
EGGQ has an expense ratio of 0.93% while FELC charges 0.18%. FELC is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EGGQ or FELC?
Over the past year EGGQ returned +5.59% vs +19.54% for FELC, so FELC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGGQ annualized +19.57% vs +17.91% for FELC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EGGQ or FELC?
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund at 35.7% annualized versus 12.4% for FELC. Worst drawdown: EGGQ -33.6% vs FELC -18.6%.
Should I hold both EGGQ and FELC?
EGGQ and FELC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EGGQ and FELC?
57.2% of EGGQ's money is in holdings FELC also owns. 10.1% of FELC's is in holdings EGGQ also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 300 in FELC.
Which pays a higher dividend, EGGQ or FELC?
EGGQ yields 8.26% while FELC yields 0.83%, so EGGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FELC better than EGGQ?
FELC has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, FELC over 1Y. FELC is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.