EGGQ vs FTCS
NestYield Visionary ETF vs First Trust Capital Strength ETF
Which is better, EGGQ or FTCS?
EGGQ has been ahead.
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EGGQ | FTCS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.52%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $7.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.26% | 1.22% |
| Holdings | 45 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +11.07%Best | +6.41% |
| 1Y Return | +5.59%Tie | +5.59%Tie |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.06% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.7% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -10.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,795Best | $11,352 |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.9% | 22.5%Best |
| Fund Family | NestYield | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | Jul 6, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
EGGQ vs FTCS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
EGGQ vs FTCS Performance
NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) is an ETF from NestYield and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year EGGQ returned +5.59% while FTCS returned +5.59%. Year to date, EGGQ is up 11.07% versus a gain of 6.41% for FTCS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.7% compared with 10.4% for FTCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for EGGQ and -10.5% for FTCS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EGGQ charges 0.93% per year while FTCS charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $52 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGGQ currently yields 8.26% against 1.22% for FTCS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 23 holdings in EGGQ and 50 in FTCS, totalling 95.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 50 in FTCS, against full books of 45 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 50 positions for FTCS that do not appear in our book for EGGQ (99.9% of the fund), and 21 for EGGQ that do not appear in FTCS (91.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EGGQ and FTCS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EGGQ or FTCS?
EGGQ has an expense ratio of 0.93% while FTCS charges 0.52%. FTCS is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EGGQ or FTCS?
Over the past year EGGQ returned +5.59% vs +5.59% for FTCS, so FTCS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGGQ annualized +19.57% vs +7.30% for FTCS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EGGQ or FTCS?
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund at 35.7% annualized versus 10.4% for FTCS. Worst drawdown: EGGQ -33.6% vs FTCS -10.5%.
Should I hold both EGGQ and FTCS?
EGGQ and FTCS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EGGQ or FTCS?
EGGQ yields 8.26% while FTCS yields 1.22%, so EGGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FTCS better than EGGQ?
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window. FTCS is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.