EGGQ vs HELO
NestYield Visionary ETF vs JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
Which is better, EGGQ or HELO?
Each has led over a different period.
HELO has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, HELO over 1Y. HELO is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EGGQ | HELO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $4.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.26% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 45 | 156 |
| YTD Return | +11.07%Best | +4.91% |
| 1Y Return | +5.59% | +7.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.7% | 7.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -10.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,795Best | $11,301 |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.9% | 40.1%Best |
| Fund Family | NestYield | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | Sep 28, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
EGGQ vs HELO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
EGGQ vs HELO Performance
NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) is an ETF from NestYield and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year EGGQ returned +5.59% while HELO returned +7.68%. Year to date, EGGQ is up 11.07% versus a gain of 4.91% for HELO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.7% compared with 7.3% for HELO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for EGGQ and -10.9% for HELO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EGGQ charges 0.93% per year while HELO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $50 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGGQ currently yields 8.26% against 0.57% for HELO.
Holdings Overlap
41.1% of EGGQ's money is in holdings HELO also owns. 9.2% of HELO's money is in holdings EGGQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 146 in HELO, against full books of 45 and 156.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 134 positions for HELO that do not appear in our book for EGGQ (89.3% of the fund), and 12 for EGGQ that do not appear in HELO (50.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EGGQ | Weight in HELO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STXSeagate Technolo | 10.52% | 0.60% | 9.92% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.50% | 1.70% | 3.80% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.75% | 3.16% | 0.59% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.84% | 1.28% | 3.56% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 5.39% | 0.43% | 4.96% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 3.96% | 0.53% | 3.43% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.20% | 1.14% | 1.06% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 2.59% | 0.27% | 2.32% |
| CIENCiena Corp | 2.38% | 0.07% | 2.31% |
41.1% of EGGQ is already inside HELO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EGGQ or HELO?
EGGQ has an expense ratio of 0.93% while HELO charges 0.50%. HELO is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EGGQ or HELO?
Over the past year EGGQ returned +5.59% vs +7.68% for HELO, so HELO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGGQ annualized +19.57% vs +7.03% for HELO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EGGQ or HELO?
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund at 35.7% annualized versus 7.3% for HELO. Worst drawdown: EGGQ -33.6% vs HELO -10.9%.
Should I hold both EGGQ and HELO?
EGGQ and HELO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EGGQ and HELO?
41.1% of EGGQ's money is in holdings HELO also owns. 9.2% of HELO's is in holdings EGGQ also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 146 in HELO.
Which pays a higher dividend, EGGQ or HELO?
EGGQ yields 8.26% while HELO yields 0.57%, so EGGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HELO better than EGGQ?
HELO has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, HELO over 1Y. HELO is less concentrated, with 40.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.