EGGQ vs USMC
NestYield Visionary ETF vs Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
Which is better, EGGQ or USMC?
Each has led over a different period.
USMC has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, USMC over 1Y. USMC is less concentrated, with 55.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EGGQ | USMC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.12%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $5.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.26% | 0.74% |
| Holdings | 45 | 58 |
| YTD Return | +11.07% | +13.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.59% | +14.91%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.7% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -19.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,795Best | $13,034 |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.9% | 55.3%Best |
| Fund Family | NestYield | Principal Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | Oct 11, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
EGGQ vs USMC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
EGGQ vs USMC Performance
NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) is an ETF from NestYield and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is an ETF from Principal Funds. Over the past year EGGQ returned +5.59% while USMC returned +14.91%. Year to date, EGGQ is up 11.07% versus a gain of 13.98% for USMC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.7% compared with 12.3% for USMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for EGGQ and -19.1% for USMC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EGGQ charges 0.93% per year while USMC charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $12 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGGQ currently yields 8.26% against 0.74% for USMC.
Holdings Overlap
11.4% of EGGQ's money is in holdings USMC also owns. 14.8% of USMC's money is in holdings EGGQ also owns.
USMC and EGGQ share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 27 in USMC, against full books of 45 and 58.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for USMC that do not appear in our book for EGGQ (85.2% of the fund), and 18 for EGGQ that do not appear in USMC (80.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EGGQ and USMC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EGGQ or USMC?
EGGQ has an expense ratio of 0.93% while USMC charges 0.12%. USMC is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EGGQ or USMC?
Over the past year EGGQ returned +5.59% vs +14.91% for USMC, so USMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGGQ annualized +19.57% vs +15.86% for USMC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EGGQ or USMC?
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund at 35.7% annualized versus 12.3% for USMC. Worst drawdown: EGGQ -33.6% vs USMC -19.1%.
Should I hold both EGGQ and USMC?
EGGQ and USMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EGGQ and USMC?
14.8% of USMC's money is in holdings EGGQ also owns. 14.8% of USMC's is in holdings EGGQ also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 27 in USMC.
Which pays a higher dividend, EGGQ or USMC?
EGGQ yields 8.26% while USMC yields 0.74%, so EGGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USMC better than EGGQ?
USMC has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, USMC over 1Y. USMC is less concentrated, with 55.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.