EMCR vs VTI
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMCR or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMCR led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $59M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,373 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.09% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.61%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.28% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.74% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,517 | $17,616Best |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.9 years).
EMCR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
EMCR vs VTI Performance
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMCR returned +17.61% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, EMCR is up 11.09% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, EMCR compounded at +21.28% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.74% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.78% annualized vs +9.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for EMCR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCR charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCR currently yields 1.48% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 22 holdings in EMCR and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 1.7% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EMCR and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 1,373 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMCR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCR or VTI?
EMCR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMCR or VTI?
Over the past year EMCR returned +17.61% vs +16.63% for VTI, so EMCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCR annualized +9.49% vs +14.78% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMCR or VTI?
EMCR has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMCR -34.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both EMCR and VTI?
EMCR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCR or VTI?
EMCR yields 1.48% while VTI yields 1.06%, so EMCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMCR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMCR led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.