EOD vs IVV
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EOD or IVV?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EOD led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. EOD is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOD | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $304M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.96% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 397 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +14.45%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +20.51%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.36%Best | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.31% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -85.6% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,869 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.7%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2007 to Oct 14, 2026 (19.5 years).
EOD vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.5 years both funds cover.
EOD vs IVV Performance
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EOD returned +20.51% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, EOD is up 14.45% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, EOD compounded at +27.36% per year against +22.46% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.31% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.50% annualized vs -3.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.6% for EOD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOD charges 1.37% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $137 vs $3 annually, a gap of $134 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOD currently yields 7.96% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
40.1% of EOD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 45.0% of IVV's money is in holdings EOD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, EOD as of Jul 31, 2026 and IVV as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
36 positions in common, counted across the 298 positions we hold weights for in EOD and 506 in IVV, against full books of 397 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EOD (54.4% of the fund), and 210 for EOD that do not appear in IVV (26.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EOD | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.80% | 8.44% | 4.64% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.46% | 7.29% | 3.83% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.57% | 5.76% | 3.19% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.00% | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.97% | 3.68% | 1.71% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.82% | 2.47% | 0.65% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.89% | 2.42% | 1.53% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.42% | 1.39% | 0.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.71% | 1.87% | 1.16% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.88% | 0.50% | 1.38% |
45.0% of IVV is already inside EOD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOD or IVV?
EOD has an expense ratio of 1.37% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $134 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EOD or IVV?
Over the past year EOD returned +20.51% vs +17.54% for IVV, so EOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EOD annualized -3.08% vs +9.50% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EOD or IVV?
EOD has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EOD -85.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EOD and IVV?
EOD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EOD and IVV?
45.0% of IVV's money is in holdings EOD also owns. 45.0% of IVV's is in holdings EOD also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 298 positions we hold weights for in EOD and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOD or IVV?
EOD yields 7.96% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EOD?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EOD led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. EOD is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.