EPMV vs FEMD
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF vs First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, EPMV or FEMD?
FEMD costs less.
FEMD has a lower expense ratio. FEMD is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPMV | FEMD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.88% | 0.55%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 61 | 69 |
| YTD Return | +10.50%Best | -2.00% |
| 1Y Return | +15.29% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.8% | 23.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | First Eagle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 1, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
EPMV vs FEMD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EPMV vs FEMD Performance
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF (FEMD) is an ETF from First Eagle Investments. Year to date, EPMV is up 10.50% versus a loss of 2.00% for FEMD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPMV charges 0.88% per year while FEMD charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $55 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPMV currently yields 1.33% against 0.00% for FEMD.
Holdings Overlap
9.0% of EPMV's money is in holdings FEMD also owns. 7.9% of FEMD's money is in holdings EPMV also owns.
EPMV and FEMD share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in EPMV and 64 in FEMD, against full books of 61 and 69.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 56 positions for FEMD that do not appear in our book for EPMV (87.4% of the fund), and 54 for EPMV that do not appear in FEMD (85.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EPMV and FEMD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPMV or FEMD?
EPMV has an expense ratio of 0.88% while FEMD charges 0.55%. FEMD is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between EPMV and FEMD?
9.0% of EPMV's money is in holdings FEMD also owns. 7.9% of FEMD's is in holdings EPMV also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in EPMV and 64 in FEMD.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPMV or FEMD?
EPMV yields 1.33% while FEMD yields 0.00%, so EPMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FEMD better than EPMV?
FEMD has a lower expense ratio. FEMD is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.