ERNZ vs FELC
TrueShares Active Yield ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, ERNZ or FELC?
FELC has been ahead.
FELC has a lower expense ratio. FELC led over 1Y and the full window. ERNZ is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERNZ | FELC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.25% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $8.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.71% | 0.83% |
| Holdings | 144 | 590 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6%Best | 10.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2%Best | -18.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $9,968 | $13,253Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 40.1% |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2024 | Nov 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 204 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ERNZ has data through Mar 24, 2026 and FELC through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2024 to Mar 24, 2026 (1.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FELC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.5% compared with 9.6% for ERNZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for ERNZ and -18.6% for FELC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERNZ charges 3.25% per year while FELC charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $325 vs $18 annually, a gap of $307 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERNZ currently yields 8.71% against 0.83% for FELC.
Holdings Overlap
8.7% of ERNZ's money is in holdings FELC also owns. 4.3% of FELC's money is in holdings ERNZ also owns.
ERNZ and FELC share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 245 days apart, ERNZ as of Jan 30, 2026 and FELC as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
15 positions in common, counted across the 141 positions we hold weights for in ERNZ and 300 in FELC, against full books of 144 and 590.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 207 positions for FELC that do not appear in our book for ERNZ (95.0% of the fund), and 117 for ERNZ that do not appear in FELC (83.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ERNZ | Weight in FELC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.13% | 0.79% | 0.34% |
| PGRProgressive Corporation | 1.20% | 0.69% | 0.51% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.96% | 0.83% | 0.13% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.36% | 0.71% | 0.35% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.33% | 0.67% | 0.34% |
| CLXClorox Co. | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.86% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
| VIRTVirtu Financial Inc Class A | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.66% | 0.07% | 0.59% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.38% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ERNZ and FELC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERNZ or FELC?
ERNZ has an expense ratio of 3.25% while FELC charges 0.18%. FELC is the cheaper option, by $307 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ERNZ or FELC?
FELC has been the more volatile fund at 10.5% annualized versus 9.6% for ERNZ. Worst drawdown: ERNZ -14.2% vs FELC -18.6%.
Should I hold both ERNZ and FELC?
ERNZ and FELC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ERNZ and FELC?
8.7% of ERNZ's money is in holdings FELC also owns. 4.3% of FELC's is in holdings ERNZ also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 141 positions we hold weights for in ERNZ and 300 in FELC.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERNZ or FELC?
ERNZ yields 8.71% while FELC yields 0.83%, so ERNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FELC better than ERNZ?
FELC has a lower expense ratio. FELC led over 1Y and the full window. ERNZ is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.