ERNZ vs FTCS
TrueShares Active Yield ETF vs First Trust Capital Strength ETF
Which is better, ERNZ or FTCS?
FTCS has been ahead.
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. FTCS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERNZ | FTCS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.25% | 0.52%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $7.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.71% | 1.22% |
| Holdings | 144 | 102 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6%Best | 10.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2% | -12.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $9,968 | $11,611Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Tie | 22.5%Tie |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2024 | Jul 6, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 204 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ERNZ has data through Mar 24, 2026 and FTCS through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2024 to Mar 24, 2026 (1.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.9% compared with 9.6% for ERNZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for ERNZ and -12.6% for FTCS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERNZ charges 3.25% per year while FTCS charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $325 vs $52 annually, a gap of $273 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERNZ currently yields 8.71% against 1.22% for FTCS.
Holdings Overlap
2.1% of ERNZ's money is in holdings FTCS also owns. 6.8% of FTCS's money is in holdings ERNZ also owns.
FTCS and ERNZ share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 245 days apart, ERNZ as of Jan 30, 2026 and FTCS as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
3 positions in common, counted across the 141 positions we hold weights for in ERNZ and 50 in FTCS, against full books of 144 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 47 positions for FTCS that do not appear in our book for ERNZ (93.0% of the fund), and 129 for ERNZ that do not appear in FTCS (90.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ERNZ and FTCS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERNZ or FTCS?
ERNZ has an expense ratio of 3.25% while FTCS charges 0.52%. FTCS is the cheaper option, by $273 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ERNZ or FTCS?
FTCS has been the more volatile fund at 10.9% annualized versus 9.6% for ERNZ. Worst drawdown: ERNZ -14.2% vs FTCS -12.6%.
Should I hold both ERNZ and FTCS?
ERNZ and FTCS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ERNZ and FTCS?
6.8% of FTCS's money is in holdings ERNZ also owns. 6.8% of FTCS's is in holdings ERNZ also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 141 positions we hold weights for in ERNZ and 50 in FTCS.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERNZ or FTCS?
ERNZ yields 8.71% while FTCS yields 1.22%, so ERNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FTCS better than ERNZ?
FTCS has a lower expense ratio. FTCS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.