ERNZ vs HELO
TrueShares Active Yield ETF vs JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
Which is better, ERNZ or HELO?
HELO has been ahead.
HELO has a lower expense ratio. HELO led over 1Y and the full window. ERNZ is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERNZ | HELO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.25% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $4.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.71% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 144 | 156 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6% | 6.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2% | -10.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $9,968 | $11,907Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 40.1% |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2024 | Sep 28, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 205 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ERNZ has data through Mar 24, 2026 and HELO through Oct 15, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2024 to Mar 24, 2026 (1.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ERNZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.6% compared with 6.6% for HELO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for ERNZ and -10.9% for HELO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERNZ charges 3.25% per year while HELO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $325 vs $50 annually, a gap of $275 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERNZ currently yields 8.71% against 0.57% for HELO.
Holdings Overlap
4.2% of ERNZ's money is in holdings HELO also owns. 3.4% of HELO's money is in holdings ERNZ also owns.
ERNZ and HELO share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 228 days apart, ERNZ as of Jan 30, 2026 and HELO as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
7 positions in common, counted across the 141 positions we hold weights for in ERNZ and 146 in HELO, against full books of 144 and 156.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 136 positions for HELO that do not appear in our book for ERNZ (95.1% of the fund), and 125 for ERNZ that do not appear in HELO (88.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ERNZ | Weight in HELO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.96% | 1.12% | 0.16% |
| PGRProgressive Corporation | 1.20% | 0.23% | 0.97% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.38% | 0.74% | 0.36% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.33% | 0.58% | 0.25% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.66% | 0.17% | 0.49% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 0.53% | 0.20% | 0.33% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 0.15% | 0.38% | 0.23% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ERNZ and HELO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERNZ or HELO?
ERNZ has an expense ratio of 3.25% while HELO charges 0.50%. HELO is the cheaper option, by $275 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ERNZ or HELO?
ERNZ has been the more volatile fund at 9.6% annualized versus 6.6% for HELO. Worst drawdown: ERNZ -14.2% vs HELO -10.9%.
Should I hold both ERNZ and HELO?
ERNZ and HELO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ERNZ and HELO?
4.2% of ERNZ's money is in holdings HELO also owns. 3.4% of HELO's is in holdings ERNZ also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 141 positions we hold weights for in ERNZ and 146 in HELO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERNZ or HELO?
ERNZ yields 8.71% while HELO yields 0.57%, so ERNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HELO better than ERNZ?
HELO has a lower expense ratio. HELO led over 1Y and the full window. ERNZ is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.