ERNZ vs NUDG
TrueShares Active Yield ETF vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, ERNZ or NUDG?
NUDG has been ahead.
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. ERNZ is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERNZ | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.25% | 0.61%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $6.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.71% | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 144 | 43 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6% | - |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 42.3% |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2024 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 204 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ERNZ has data through Mar 24, 2026 and NUDG through Oct 14, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERNZ charges 3.25% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $325 vs $61 annually, a gap of $264 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERNZ currently yields 8.71% against 0.50% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
1.9% of ERNZ's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 8.1% of NUDG's money is in holdings ERNZ also owns.
NUDG and ERNZ share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 213 days apart, ERNZ as of Jan 30, 2026 and NUDG as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 141 positions we hold weights for in ERNZ and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 144 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 37 positions for NUDG that do not appear in our book for ERNZ (86.4% of the fund), and 128 for ERNZ that do not appear in NUDG (90.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ERNZ and NUDG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERNZ or NUDG?
ERNZ has an expense ratio of 3.25% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $264 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ERNZ and NUDG?
8.1% of NUDG's money is in holdings ERNZ also owns. 8.1% of NUDG's is in holdings ERNZ also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 141 positions we hold weights for in ERNZ and 42 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERNZ or NUDG?
ERNZ yields 8.71% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so ERNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than ERNZ?
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. ERNZ is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.