ESIM vs QQQ
Eventide International ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ESIM or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ESIM is less concentrated, with 26.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESIM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $30M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 348 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +11.92% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.5%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Eventide | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ESIM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ESIM vs QQQ Performance
Eventide International ETF (ESIM) is an ETF from Eventide and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ESIM is up 11.92% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESIM charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESIM currently yields 1.43% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of ESIM's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings ESIM also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in ESIM and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 348 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ESIM (95.5% of the fund), and 15 for ESIM that do not appear in QQQ (9.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ESIM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESIM or QQQ?
ESIM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESIM or QQQ?
ESIM yields 1.43% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so ESIM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ESIM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ESIM is less concentrated, with 26.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.