ESLG vs QQQ
Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ESLG or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. ESLG is less concentrated, with 32.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESLG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $27M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 357 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +13.55% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.08% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0%Best | 21.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,264 | $12,111Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.3%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Eventide | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
ESLG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ESLG vs QQQ Performance
Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) is an ETF from Eventide and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ESLG returned +13.08% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, ESLG is up 13.55% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 16.0% for ESLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for ESLG and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESLG charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESLG currently yields 0.40% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
44.5% of ESLG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 36.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings ESLG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
34 positions in common, counted across the 119 positions we hold weights for in ESLG and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 357 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 59 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ESLG (60.3% of the fund), and 79 for ESLG that do not appear in QQQ (52.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ESLG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 11.03% | 8.33% | 2.70% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.31% | 5.02% | 2.71% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 2.94% | 4.17% | 1.23% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.73% | 2.53% | 1.20% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 2.16% | 1.35% | 0.81% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.73% | 1.72% | 0.01% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc. Class A | 2.19% | 1.13% | 1.06% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.87% | 1.70% | 0.83% |
| KLACKla Corp. | 1.34% | 1.06% | 0.28% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.59% | 0.43% | 1.16% |
44.5% of ESLG is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESLG or QQQ?
ESLG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESLG or QQQ?
Over the past year ESLG returned +13.08% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ESLG annualized +12.64% vs +21.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESLG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 16.0% for ESLG. Worst drawdown: ESLG -12.4% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both ESLG and QQQ?
ESLG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ESLG and QQQ?
44.5% of ESLG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 36.2% of QQQ's is in holdings ESLG also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 119 positions we hold weights for in ESLG and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESLG or QQQ?
ESLG yields 0.40% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ESLG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. ESLG is less concentrated, with 32.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.