FDAT vs QLTY
Tactical Advantage ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, FDAT or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDAT | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $36M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.94% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 9 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +2.79% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.00% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.28% | +21.84%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.6%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.2%Best | -17.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $13,260 | $17,733Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | Tactical Advantage | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2023 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
FDAT vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FDAT vs QLTY Performance
Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is an ETF from Tactical Advantage and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year FDAT returned +2.00% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, FDAT is up 2.79% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Over three years, FDAT compounded at +9.28% per year against +21.84% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QLTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 8.6% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.2% for FDAT and -17.0% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDAT charges 1.16% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $50 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDAT currently yields 5.94% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 8 holdings in FDAT and 45 in QLTY, totalling 100.0% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in FDAT and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 9 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 45 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for FDAT (99.7% of the fund), and 8 for FDAT that do not appear in QLTY (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FDAT and QLTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDAT or QLTY?
FDAT has an expense ratio of 1.16% while QLTY charges 0.50%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDAT or QLTY?
Over the past year FDAT returned +2.00% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDAT or QLTY?
QLTY has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 8.6% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: FDAT -8.2% vs QLTY -17.0%.
Should I hold both FDAT and QLTY?
FDAT and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDAT or QLTY?
FDAT yields 5.94% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than FDAT?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.