FESC vs OMFS
First Eagle Small Cap Equity ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Which is better, FESC or OMFS?
OMFS costs less.
OMFS has a lower expense ratio. FESC is less concentrated, with 10.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FESC | OMFS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $264M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.30% |
| Holdings | 184 | 2,228 |
| YTD Return | -9.73% | +8.89%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.67% |
| Top 10 Weight | 10.4%Best | 12.0% |
| Fund Family | First Eagle Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2026 | Nov 8, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FESC vs OMFS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FESC vs OMFS Performance
First Eagle Small Cap Equity ETF (FESC) is an ETF from First Eagle Investments and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, FESC is down 9.73% versus a gain of 8.89% for OMFS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FESC charges 0.55% per year while OMFS charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $39 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FESC currently yields 0.00% against 1.30% for OMFS.
Holdings Overlap
56.3% of FESC's money is in holdings OMFS also owns. 11.6% of OMFS's money is in holdings FESC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
101 positions in common, counted across the 181 positions we hold weights for in FESC and 933 in OMFS, against full books of 184 and 2,228.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 785 positions for OMFS that do not appear in our book for FESC (81.7% of the fund), and 73 for FESC that do not appear in OMFS (39.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FESC | Weight in OMFS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDNACaredx Inc | 1.04% | 0.48% | 0.56% |
| ABCBAmeris Bancorp Common Stock Usd1.0 | 1.05% | 0.26% | 0.79% |
| LPGDorian Lpg Ltd | 1.21% | 0.08% | 1.13% |
| ONBOld National Bancorp/In Common Stock | 0.95% | 0.30% | 0.65% |
| PLXSPlexus Corp | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.07% |
| AXAxos Financial Inc | 0.89% | 0.20% | 0.69% |
| RELYRemitly Global, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.15% | 0.76% |
| MURMurphy Oil Corp | 0.92% | 0.13% | 0.79% |
| MCMoelis & Co_None_0 | 0.26% | 0.79% | 0.53% |
| ROGRoche Holding Ag- Genusschein | 0.80% | 0.22% | 0.58% |
56.3% of FESC is already inside OMFS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FESC or OMFS?
FESC has an expense ratio of 0.55% while OMFS charges 0.39%. OMFS is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FESC and OMFS?
56.3% of FESC's money is in holdings OMFS also owns. 11.6% of OMFS's is in holdings FESC also owns. They hold 101 positions in common, counted across the 181 positions we hold weights for in FESC and 933 in OMFS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FESC or OMFS?
FESC yields 0.00% while OMFS yields 1.30%, so OMFS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OMFS better than FESC?
OMFS has a lower expense ratio. FESC is less concentrated, with 10.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.